Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus controversial speech before the Joint Session of the United States Congress in the first week of March was constantly punctuated by applause and rounds of standing ovation. But the content of his speech was familiar and predictable. He continued playing a politics of fear, denouncing Iran as a threat to the peace of the entire world and urging Congress to resist the emerging nuclear deal with Iran. U.S. President Barack Obama, on reading the speech transcript, said: On the core issue, which is how to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon which would make it far more dangerous, the Prime Minister did not offer any viable alternatives. The event was a spectacle, a public display of differences, both within the United States and between Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu. It is also an instance of rapidly changing geopolitics. There is reasonable hope in the international community, especially among European diplomats, that the nuclear deal may potentially be a viable alternative to the currently adversarial, sanctions-driven relations of the West with Iran. The deal, which may be finalised by the end of March, will attempt to regulate strictly Irans ability to produce nuclear fuel for at least ten years, and then gradually ease the restrictions. In turn, the West would ease its sanctions that currently curtail Irans oil exports and prevent it from accessing global financial markets. In this context, Mr. Netanyahus call for a complete dismantling of Irans nuclear infrastructure seems unrealistic, outdated and worthy of being ignored.
Within the U.S., the opposition to Mr. Obama is getting increasingly bitter. Forty-seven Republican Senators sent an open letter to Irans leaders on Monday, warning them that any nuclear deal that they sign with President Obama could last only as long as he remains in office, which is until January 2017. To this, Mr. Obama reportedly said: I think its somewhat ironic to see some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran. The fact is that as Irans clout in the region grows, it is gradually stealing Israels thunder. Iran is playing a key role in defending Iraq against the IS onslaught, and the U.S. recognises the value of an Iran-backed militia fighting in Tikrit. Though America is uncomfortable with the Syrian regime, it sees the strategic significance of Irans support to Bashar al-Assad in countering IS. So it is IS that is becoming a common cause for the U.S. and Iran, giving reason for a rapprochement. Mr. Netanyahus concern is understandable, but when given an opportunity to present his case he has made little of it. –The Hindu
Follow this link to join our WhatsApp group: Join Now
Be Part of Quality Journalism |
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast. |
ACT NOW |
MONTHLY | Rs 100 | |
YEARLY | Rs 1000 | |
LIFETIME | Rs 10000 | |