New Delhi- The Lok Sabha early Thursday passed the contentious Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after over a 12-hour debate, which saw the ruling NDA strongly defending the legislation as beneficial for minorities, while the opposition described it as “anti-Muslim”.
The Bill was passed after all amendments moved by the opposition members were rejected by voice votes. It was passed after a division of votes — 288 in favour and 232 against.
In his reply to the debate, Union Minorities Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said there is no place in the world safer than India for minorities and they are safe because the majority is entirely secular.
He said even a minuscule minority community like the Parsis are safe in India and all minorities here live with pride.
“Some members have said that minorities are not safe in India. This statement is completely false. There is no place safer than India for minorities. I am also a minority and we all are living here without any fear and with pride,” he said after the debate on the Bill.
The minister said whenever a minority community faces persecution, it always comes to India to take refuge and cited the examples of the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan community, minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.
“Minorities of Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan came to India after facing religious persecution in their respective countries. How can you say that minorities are not safe in India. Very, very wrong to say this.
“The coming generation will never forgive you. Minorities in India are safe because the majorities of the country are fully secular. This is not the case in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. But still, you abuse us,” he said.
Rijiju said, through the Bill, the NDA government is going to unify all minorities in the country. He also highlighted the “wholehearted” support of the Christian community for the Bill.
He said a large number of disputes are pending with the Waqf tribunals and through the legislation, the government wants to expedite these cases.
“We want to expedite the resolution of the disputes in the tribunals. Justice delayed is justice denied. Widows, divorcees, and orphans will be given justice through the Bill,” he said.
Earlier, making an intervention in the debate, Union Home Minister Amit Shah asserted that a vote bank was being created by intimidating minorities and confusion being spread in the country in the name of the Waqf bill.
“The Narendra Modi government runs on a very clear principle that we will not bring any law for vote bank because law is for justice and welfare of people,” he said, adding, “Everyone has the right to follow their religion, but conversion cannot be done for greed, temptation and fear.”
He stressed that it has become a fashion to create fear among the people of the minority community.
“It is the resolve of the Modi government that no citizen of this country, irrespective of his religion, will be harmed,” Shah said.
He said the non-Muslims in Waqf council and boards are meant purely to ensure the administration of properties in accordance with stated aims.
Shah said if there had not been an amendment in the Wakf Act in 2013, there would have been no need to bring this legislation.
“Elections were due in 2014 and in 2013, the extreme Wakf law was made overnight for the purpose of appeasement. As a result, 123 properties in Delhi’s Lutyen’s Zone were handed over to the Wakf just 25 days before the elections,” he said.
He said a vote bank was being consolidated by intimidating minorities and confusion being spread to strike fear among minorities.
Earlier, there was no provision to include any non-Muslim among those who run religious institutions and the NDA government is not going to do it either, he said.
Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the INDIA bloc will oppose the proposed changes to the Waqf law and called the Bill an attack on the basic structure of the Constitution.
He accused the government of misleading Parliament, referencing past discussions on the matter.
“This Bill is an attack on the basic structure of our Constitution, an attack on our federal structure, and has four primary objectives: to dilute the Constitution, to defame minority communities, to divide Indian society, and to disenfranchise minorities,” he alleged.
Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav claimed that the Bill was a BJP ploy for polarisation following its reverses in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. He claimed the Bill would send a wrong message to the world and dent the country’s secular image.
The Bill will prove to be a “Waterloo” for the BJP as some of its allies might be claiming to support the legislation but inside they are not happy about it, he said.
Participating in the debate, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi staged a symbolic protest by tearing up a copy of the Bill.
Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, in a post on X, called the Waqf Bill a weapon, aimed at marginalising Muslims and usurping their personal laws and property rights.
“This attack on the Constitution by the RSS, BJP and their allies is aimed at Muslims today but sets a precedent to target other communities in the future,” he said.
According to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, Waqf tribunals will be strengthened, a structured selection process will be maintained, and a tenure will be fixed to ensure efficient dispute resolution.
As per the Bill, while Waqf institutions’ mandatory contribution to Waqf boards is reduced from 7 per cent to 5 per cent, Waqf institutions earning over Rs 1 lakh will undergo audits by state-sponsored auditors.
A centralised portal will automate Waqf property management, improving efficiency and transparency.
The Bill proposes that practising Muslims (for at least five years) can dedicate their property to the Waqf, restoring pre-2013 rules.
It stipulates that women must receive their inheritance before the Waqf declaration, with special provisions for widows, divorced women and orphans.
The Bill proposes that an officer above the rank of collector investigate government properties claimed as Waqf.
It also proposes that non-Muslim members be included in the central and state Waqf boards for inclusivity.
Bill Tabled In Rajya Sabha
Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Thursday rejected the opposition’s allegations that the rights of Muslims were being snatched away.
While tabling the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 in the Rajya Sabha, he also clarified that the “inclusive” legislation aims to empower Muslim women and protect the rights of all Muslim sects.
Some of the opposition MPs in the Upper House were wearing black as a mark of protest against the bill.
The Lok Sabha passed the bill with a 288-232 vote in the early hours of Thursday after over 12 hours of debate.
If approved by the Rajya Sabha, the legislation will be sent to President Droupadi Murmu for her approval; it would become a law after the President’s assent.
In the Rajya Sabha, Rijiju emphasised that the bill aims to usher in transparency, accountability and efficiency in the management of Waqf properties, asserting that only a Muslim can become a ‘Waqif’ and said the question of the majority of members on the Central Waqf Council being non-Muslims does not arise.
Tabling the bill in the Upper House, which was examined and redrafted by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), Rijiju said the proposed legislation has nothing to do with religion, but deals only with properties.
The minister informed the House that there were 4.9 lakh Waqf properties in 2004, which have now increased to 8.72 lakh.
Seeking the opposition’s support to pass the bill, Rijiju said it aims to accomplish the unfulfilled tasks of the previous governments.
He also said Waqf owns the largest chunk of properties in the country, leaving aside those owned by Defence and Railways.
“It has been said here that Muslims will be harmed by the step we are taking. Many people said this is unconstitutional, illegal and the right of Muslims is being snatched away… Very categorically, I want to reject all these allegations,” Rijiju said.
Speaking on ‘Waqf by User’, the Minority Affairs Minister said properties already registered with proper documentation will not be dealt with retrospectively.
“In Waqf By User, the properties already registered and cases that have already been settled, we won’t go prospectively and deal with that. It would be with a prospective effect.
“However, if there is any disputed land or any matter that is sub judice, then we cannot do away with the right of the courts. So all the Waqf properties which are registered with proper documentation, they will remain so,” Rijiju said.
He stressed that the entire exercise was aimed at bringing in the three pillars of transparency, accountability and efficiency.
“We are not here to damage anybody’s religious affiliation,” Rijiju said.
Citing a previous court judgment, the minister said it makes it clear that Waqf is a statutory body and not a representative body of Muslims.
“In the amendment, we have made it clear that any person practising Islam for more than five years can dedicate properties to Waqf. There is no iota of doubt in who can create Waqf,” he said.
“The new provisions that we have brought in, is that all the recognised sects of Muslims will constitute the Waqf Board — there will be Shias, there will be Sunnis and other backward classes will also be there in the Waqf Board as members so that the interests of all would be taken into account and I don’t think there should be any opposition to that. We are making it so inclusive,” Rijiju informed.
He further said out of 22 members in the Central Waqf Council, not more than four will be non-Muslims including ex-officio members, besides three members of Parliament who can be of any religion. The Council must include two women members, he added.
The question of the majority being non-Muslims does not arise, he reiterated.
“If we develop a Waqf property properly in the next few years, Muslims will prosper,” said the minister, appealing to the members in the Upper House to engage in a productive discussion and extend support to the bill.
Rijiju said 31,999 cases are pending in the Waqf Tribunal and more than 14,000 litigants are Muslims, adding that the right to appeal has also been added.
“We have not done this for any personal gain,” said the minister, as he emphasised that the intent behind the proposed legislation was to put an end to the malpractices of people grabbing other people’s property.
“We should not say anything which creates a furore or gives rise to a conflict,” Rijiju said, urging members to share perspectives on the bill in a manner that enhances the quality of the debate.
He expressed the hope that all members would extend support to the proposed legislation.
Follow this link to join our WhatsApp group: Join Now
Be Part of Quality Journalism |
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast. |
| ACT NOW |
| MONTHLY | Rs 100 |  |
| YEARLY | Rs 1000 | |
| LIFETIME | Rs 10000 | |
