The UN General Assembly vote, a resounding 153 countries including India in favor of a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, speaks volumes about global opinion on the ongoing conflict. Despite this overwhelming support, the US and Israel, among a mere handful of dissenters, stood in opposition. This non-binding resolution, while lacking legal enforcement, serves as a significant gauge of international sentiment.
The consequences of this decision extend beyond a mere diplomatic gesture. They underline a poignant ethical dilemma: the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza. The toll of this conflict is harrowing—more than 18,000 lives lost, a majority of whom are women and children. Displacement has affected over 80 percent of Gaza’s 2.3 million inhabitants, rendering living conditions dire.
Amidst relentless airstrikes which has leveled neighbourhoods and a suffocating siege, Gaza has acquired the air of a graveyard. The Israeli offensive has stopped essential resources—food, fuel, water, and electricity—compounding the misery of its inhabitants. The situation, deemed by UN officials as “hell on earth,” demands urgent intervention and cessation of hostilities.
The failure of the UN Security Council’s resolution, vetoed by the US with the UK abstaining, has let the tragedy drag on. Unlike the non-binding UNGA resolution, UNSC decisions hold authoritative weight. The deadlock in the Security Council amplifies the urgency for a unified global response to alleviate the suffering of innocent civilians.
The rejection of the ceasefire resolution serves as a litmus test for international institutions’ credibility and commitment to humanitarian principles. The amendments introduced by the US and Austria, seeking to condemn a specific Hamas attack, were seen by many as attempts to politicize an issue that transcends geopolitical interests. Their failure to pass underlines the need for a focused, impartial approach in resolving the crisis.
The divergent narratives presented by stakeholders reflect the struggle to balance geopolitical alliances with humanitarian imperatives. The Biden administration’s unwavering support for Israel’s military actions has sparked debates about double standards in foreign policy. The administration’s recent acknowledgment of Israel losing international support highlights the evolving global stance on this issue.
As the conflict perpetuates, the world is watching, struggling with ethical quandaries and the imperative to act. The urgent need for a ceasefire persists, transcending political allegiances and demands immediate attention from global leaders. And it is time that the world comes together and ends the tragedy playing out right before us in broad daylight.
Follow this link to join our WhatsApp group: Join Now
Be Part of Quality Journalism |
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast. |
| ACT NOW |
| MONTHLY | Rs 100 |  |
| YEARLY | Rs 1000 | |
| LIFETIME | Rs 10000 | |
