A new book – Partition: The Story of Indian independence – examines the division of India 70 years ago. Former Yorkshire Evening Press feature writer ROBERT BEAUMONT, whose father was involved in drawing up the line which separated the two countries, gives his verdict
The aftermath of the Partition of India, whose 70th anniversary has been celebrated this summer, was shocking. The number of civilians who died following independence is estimated at one million and they died in truly horrible circumstances.
Arson, torture, mass rape and indiscriminate, senseless rape were commonplace as India was divided into two separate nations along religious lines. The last Viceroy of India, the arrogant, intellectually lightweight Lord Mountbatten promised that there would be no bloodshed once the partition line had been drawn. He could not have been more wrong.
[[{“type”:”media”,”fid”:”24718″,”view_mode”:”wysiwyg”,”instance_fields”:”override”}]]
Inevitably, in the wake of such a humanitarian catastrophe with also saw 12 million people uprooted in the largest human migration in history, the blame game has been in overdrive ever since.
There have been few nuanced, contextual reactions, with the Mountbatten camp trying to excuse his folly by saying he was under intense pressure from the British Government to oversee partition as quickly as possible, while films such as ghastly The Viceroys House and some strange, lop-sided coverage from the BBC have perpetuated the myth that the bloodshed was all the fault of years of British colonial ambition and misrule.
So Barney White-Spunners new book Partition is timely, since it is essentially objective, with a proper regard and respect for historical truth.