New Delhi- A Delhi court on Wednesday awarded life imprisonment to Muhammad Yasin Malik, one of the foremost separatist leaders of Jammu and Kashmir, in a militant funding case, saying the crimes were intended to strike at the “heart of the idea of India” and intended to forcefully secede J&K from Union of India.
Special Judge Praveen Singh awarded varying jail terms to Malik for offences under the stringent anti-terror law–Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and the IPC, rejecting the NIA’s plea for capital punishment.
He said the crimes for which Malik was convicted were of very serious nature.
These crimes were intended to strike at the heart of the idea of India and intended to forcefully secede J&K from UOI. The crime becomes more serious as it was committed with the assistance of foreign powers and designated militants. The seriousness of the crime is further increased by the fact that it was committed behind the smokescreen of an alleged peaceful political movement, the judge said.
The judge said the manner in which the crimes were committed was in the form of conspiracy whereby there was an attempted insurrection by instigating, stone pelting and arson, and a very large-scale violence led to shutting of the government machinery.
He, however, noted that the manner of the commission of crime, the kind of weaponry that was used, led him to a conclusion that the crime in question would fail the test of rarest of rare cases as laid down by the Supreme Court.
The court sentenced the JKLF leader to life in jail for two offences under section 121 (waging war against the Government of India) of IPC and section 17 (raising funds for terrorist act) of the UAPA.
During the hearing, Malik contended he had given up violence in the year 1994.
After the ceasefire in the year 1994, he had declared that he would follow the peaceful path of Mahatma Gandhi and engage in a non-violent political struggle. He has further contended that since then there is no evidence against him that in the last 28 years he had provided any hideout to any militant or had provided any logistic support to any terrorist organisation, the court noted from Malik’s submission.
Malik told the court he had met all the prime ministers since the time of V P Singh till Atal Bihari Vajpayee who engaged with him and gave him a political platform.
Government of India had provided him all the platforms to express his opinion in India as well as outside, and government cannot be considered to be a fool to give an opportunity to a person who was engaged in terrorist acts. He has further contended that it has been alleged that he was engaged in acts of violence in the valley post the killing of Burhan Wani.
“However, immediately after the death of Burhan Wani, he was arrested and remained in custody till November 2016. Therefore, he could not have engaged in violent protests, the judge said.
On NIA’s submission that Malik was responsible for the genocide of Kashmiri Pandits and their exodus, the judge said since the issue is not before the court and has not been adjudicated upon it cannot allow itself to be swayed by the argument.
I accordingly find that this case does not call for awarding death sentence as demanded, the judge said, rejecting NIA’s plea for awarding Malik capital punishment.
On Malik’s submission that he gave up the gun in 1994 and, thereafter, he was recognised as a legitimate political player, the judge said, In my opinion, there was no reformation of this convict.
It may be correct that the convict may have given up the gun in the year 1994, but he had never expressed any regret for the violence he had committed prior to the year 1994.
“It is to be noticed that, when he claimed to have given up the path of violence after the year 1994, the government of India took it upon its face value and gave him an opportunity to reform, and in good faith, tried to engage in a meaningful dialogue with him, and as admitted by him, gave him every platform to express his opinion, the judge said.
However, the convict did not desist from violence, he noted.
Rather, betraying the good intentions of government he took a different path to orchestrate violence in the guise of political struggle. The convict has claimed that he had followed Gandhian principle of non-violence and was spearheading a peaceful non-violent struggle.
“However, the evidence on the basis of which charges were framed and to which convict has pleaded guilty, speaks otherwise,” the judge noted.
The entire movement, he said, was planned to be violent.
I must observe here that the convict cannot invoke the Mahatma and claim to be his follower because in Mahatma Gandhi’s principles there was no place for violence, howsoever high the objective might be. It only took one small incident of violence at Chauri Chaura for the Mahatma to call off the entire non-cooperation movement,” the judge said.
He noted that Malik, despite the large-scale of violence engulfing the valley, neither condemned it nor withdrew his calendar of protest.
The judge said, in the present case, the primary consideration for awarding a sentence should be that it should serve as deterrence for those who seek to follow a similar path.
The court awarded Malik 10 year jail term each under sections 120 B (criminal conspiracy), 121-A (conspiracy to wage war against the government of India) of IPC and sections 15 (terrorism), 18 (conspiracy for terrorism) and 20 (being member of terror organisation) of UAPA.
It also awarded five year jail term each under sections 13 (unlawful act), 38 (offence related to membership of terrorism) and 39 (support given to terrorism) of UAPA.
All the sentences will run concurrently.
The court premises was under heavy security blanket through the day, with police and paramilitary forces standing guard.
Before Malik was brought into the courtoom, personnel from the NIA, the anti-terror federal agency, pressed into service sniffer dogs and conducted a thermal scanning.
After the pronouncement of the sentence, a group of people raised the Indian tricolour and shouted slogans against Malik outside the court premises.
‘Will not beg…’:
The lawyer who attended the court proceeding said, in the courtroom, “Yasin said that if I have been involved in any terrorist activity or violence in 28 years, if Indian Intelligence proves this, then I will also retire from politics. I will accept the hanging. With seven Prime Ministers, I have worked.”
On the demand by NIA for the death penalty to him, Malik said, “I will not beg for anything. The case is before this court and I left it to the court to decide it.”
Earlier, the court asked NIA to give an affidavit on the socio-economic status of convict Yasin Malik after taking the help of local authorities. Malik is also directed to file an affidavit disclosing all sources of his income and assets (movable and immovable).
Malik had told the court that he was not contesting the charges levelled against him.
The court had earlier convicted Yasin Malik for offences punishable under sections 120B IPC, 121 IPC, 121A IPC, 13 UAPA r/w 120B IPC, 15 UAPA r/w 120B IPC, 17 UAPA, 18 UAPA, 20 UAPA, 38 UAPA and 39 UAPA.
Shutdown in Srinagar
In Srinagar a spontaneous shutdown was observed ahead of the court’s order.
Most of the shops and business establishments, including in Lal Chowk, were shut.
Small protests were witnessed and minor clashes erupted between supporters of Malik, the JKLF chairman, and security forces in Maisuma neighbourhood in Srinagar.
Mobile Internet Suspended
Mobile internet was suspended in Kashmir as a precautionary measure after a court awarded life imprisonment to separatist leader Yasin Malik in a militant funding case on Wednesday, officials said.
They said the mobile internet has been suspended across all network service providers in the Valley.
However, the officials said, internet services were working on fixed-line, including fiber and broadband.
The officials said the decision to suspend the mobile internet was taken as a precautionary measure after Malik’s sentencing by a court in Delhi.
Be Part of Quality Journalism
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.