After SC Order,HC To Consider Pleas Against Highway Ban On July-22  


SRINAGAR — In wake of the Supreme Court’s decision, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has said that it will consider pleas, seeking withdrawal of ban on civilian traffic for a two days week on srinagar-Jammu highway, on July 22.   

A division bench of Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Tashi Rabstan passed the orders after senior additional advocate general B. A. Dar submitted that Supreme Court of India by an order dated May 6 has refused to entertain the prayer made by the petitioners before this Court, challenging the very order of the State Government which has been challenged by way of these petitions.

The Apex Court had disposed of a plea, challenging the home department’s highway ban order, after government said civilian traffic was restricted for only a day in a week on a stretch of the thoroughfare, from Udhampur to Baramulla for the movement of government forces.

Additional Solicitor General appearing for the State of Jammu & Kashmir, had submitted before Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta that the closure of the highway “as on date is for one day in a week, i.e., Wednesday.”

The Additional Solicitor General further submitted that the closure will be effective only till the end of May.

 “Taking into account the reasons that have prompted the state to order for the closure of the highway which is restricted to one day in the week, we are not inclined to keep this petition pending any longer,” the bench said and disposed of the plea.

The state government had issued an order on April 3 in which it said that keeping in view the Pulwama attack, another car bomb attack on government forces’ convoy at Banihal and movement of forces during the Lok Sabha elections, no civilian traffic movement will be allowed on the NH stretch from 4 am to 5 pm twice a week.

The plea was filed by Muzzafar Shah, the senior vice president of state political party ‘Awami National Conference’, and social worker Yasmeen Sonaullah.

The plea, filed through advocate Suhail Malik, had alleged that the “absurd and draconian decision” to restrict civilian traffic movement on 270 kilometre stretch on national highway directly affects lives of lakhs of people and “its indirect economic and social impact is interminable”.

“The impugned order means a virtual lockdown of the valley a day every week which will directly affect 10,000 vehicles plying every hour, which includes vehicles carrying patients, students, tourists, businessmen and government officials,” the plea had said, adding, “such an extreme step was not even adopted during the Kargil War in the year 1999”.

The plea had said: “It is further submitted that the illogical, vindictive and notorious order would result in offices, schools, colleges, banks, airports, railway stations shut for a day a week.”

It had further said that the order will “have a direct impact on the General Election of 2019 as it will disrupt the campaigning and constrict the ability of political parties and candidates to mobilise workers, set up public meetings and meet workers”.

Be Part of Quality Journalism

Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.



Observer News Service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.