WASHINGTON A United Nations official has written to Twitter Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey, asking him why the platform has begun acceding to Indias requests to act against users posting Kashmir-related content since July 2017.
David Kaye, the special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, cited Twitters reports to say that the website had not withheld any accounts or tweets despite requests from the Indian government between July 2016 and June 2017, but had started doing so after that. It seems that Twitter may have begun to accede to government demands for content and account removals since July 2017, Kaye told Dorsey in his letter dated December 10.
The reasons for this shift are unclear, Kaye said, as he reminded Dorsey of Twitters commitment to respect the human rights of its users. He said legal demands to remove content should be interpreted and implemented as narrowly as possible, to ensure the least possible restriction of expression. Kaye shared the letter on Twitter on Friday.
Users tweets and accounts were withheld when they participated in discussions concerning Kashmir on the social media platform, Kaye wrote in his letter. The affected users received notifications that either their account or tweet was withheld in response to a legal demand or based on local laws.
Kaye asked Dorsey to explain the legal, policy or other analysis that led to Twitter to start withholding tweets or accounts related to Kashmir and suspending Kashmiri Twitter handles.
to Twitters report on removal requests, the Indian government made 96 removal requests between July 2016 and December 2016, and 104 in the six months after that, Kaye said. Twitter did not act on any of them, but between July 2017 and December 2017, it withheld 17 accounts and 32 tweets after India made 144 such requests.
In a series of questions, Kaye asked Dorsey to explain how many removal requests for Kashmir-related tweets or accounts were made and how many such requests were complied with. What strategies has Twitter adopted to prevent or mitigate content or account removal requests that are inconsistent with international human rights standards, particularly for requests pertaining to Kashmir-related content? he said.
The portals biannual transparency report released on December 13 showed that between January to June 2018, India made 237 removal requests. A list of the content blocked suggests that many of the censured accounts belonged to Kashmiri users.
Twitter said it had withheld two accounts and 23 tweets in response to the demand from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 69A permits the central government to direct any intermediary to block or remove content from public view, in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, among other reasons.
Be Part of Quality Journalism
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.