In January this year a piece appeared in the media in which the author described Aligarh Muslim University research scholar Mannan Bashir Wanis joining Hizbul Mujahideen militant group a major setback to the efforts by armed forces to wean away youngsters from the path of militancy. What the author has stated reflects the collective sentiment of those in Kashmir (and there are plenty of them) who tend to view everything through the prism of confrontation. Thus, those who support militancy would certainly be celebrating the security forces failure to wean away youngsters from the path of militancy, as big victory. However, the bigger question here is whether this trend of youngsters joining militancy which ultimately results in their death is something thats really worth rejoicing?
The latest trend of educated boys joining militancy in large numbers is also being seen as another one such big victory by those who back the armed struggle in Kashmir. However, here again the jubilation is not because highly educated youth picking up the gun has proved to be game-changer for the ongoing armed struggle but only because this phenomenon has rung alarm bells amongst the administration, police and security forces. So while this may be a cause of celebration for some, it is disconcerting for many as statics prove that the majority of scholars-turned-militants have died in gunfights even before they had a chance of getting to grips with the situation. And the first instance that comes to mind is the heartrending case of Kashmir University associate professor Mohammad Rafi Bhat. Probably the most educated person to have joined militancy, Bhat was killed just 40 hours after he picked up the gun!
However, this is not the only such case. A few days ago, a group of five well educated militants of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) were killed in a gunfight with the army in Shopian. While three of the deceased were science graduates and held diplomas in various medical related fields like health care, nursing and laboratory technology, the fourth was a first year student while the fifth person was a seminary pass-out. However, the most tragic part is that while the leader Umar Nazir Malik, a graduate and diploma holder in health care had picked up the gun in April last year, the other four had joined militancy between April and July this year. And with such little experience of militancy, these boys obviously stood no chance against the much better trained and more experienced soldiers. Thus, Kashmir became poorer by five educated minds in a matter of hours.
B-Tech graduate Khursheed Ahmad Malik was killed by a joint team of army and JK Police just three days after he joined militancy. And four days after his death, Maliks name appeared amongst those who had been shortlisted for recruitment into JK Police in the rank of sub-inspector. However, whats even more intriguing is that Malik filed his online application for KAS examinations and then went and joined militancy on the same day! Maliks case should interest those who are studying reasons as to why educated young boys are picking up guns as it reflects the inner conflict that preoccupies the minds of present day youth.
Soon after the Shopian encounter we once again heard the sad news that Pulwama resident and B Tech graduate Khursheed Ahmad Malik had been gunned down by a joint team of army and JK Police. Maliks death came just three days after he joined the Al Badar militant group! And four days after his death, Maliks name appeared amongst those who had been shortlisted for recruitment into JK Police in the rank of sub-inspector. However, whats even more intriguing is that Malik filed his online application for Kashmir Administrative Service (KAS) examinations and then went and joined militancy on the same day! Maliks case should interest those who are studying reasons as to why educated young boys are picking up guns as it reflects the inner conflict that preoccupies the minds of present day youth. It also reveals how even the well educated are extremely vulnerable to external influences and that they can take impulsive decisions despite being fully aware of the dire consequences.
Though I am amongst those who dont support use of violent means for achieving the right to self determination, I nevertheless do respect the views of those who do so. I also have the highest regards for those who picked up guns and have attained martyrdom while fighting with government forces. My aversion to violence is not due to any personal, ethical or philosophical beliefs but for practical reasons. We may deny or ignore it but three decades of armed struggle has made two things very clear- one, that the gun cant drive out Indian forces from Kashmir and thus clear our way to self determination. And two that violence can most certainly make us lose a lot of goodwill and many friends. Moreover, when achievements of the armed struggle are compared with the heavy cost in terms of human lives that it is extracting from Kashmiris, then the scales dont tip in its favour.
All countries and organisations that support self determination in Kashmir univocally call for a peaceful settlement of this issue. And even though Islamabad approves of militancy in Kashmir by calling it a freedom struggle, yet its official stand that the Kashmir issue should be resolved through peaceful means remains unchanged. Even the recent report prepared by Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human rights (OHCHR) on human right violations in Kashmir has noted that Any resolution to the political situation in Kashmir should entail a commitment to ending the cycles of violence and accountability for past and current human rights violations.
By making the need to end cycles of violence as the stepping stone for resolving the Kashmir issue even the UN has rejected the very idea of using violence for achieving this aim. And when no one sees any role of guns in resolving the Kashmir issue, then why are all of us behaving like mute spectators while we are losing our boys in violence that no one approves of?
Be Part of Quality Journalism
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.