Is there a disconnect between what the government and the BJP say about Kashmir and how they act? The honest answer is I dont know although I have my suspicions. So lets explore this issue more closely.
The truth is for a while the government has sounded rather emollient. You may recall one or two instances but I bet youll be surprised by how many there have been and what they amount to.
First, on Independence Day the prime minister said the solution was to embrace Kashmiris, not shoot or abuse them. Shortly thereafter the home minister, speaking in Srinagar, said he was willing to talk to anyone and promised not to act against the sentiments of Kashmiris. He also said he would make 50 visits a year if necessary.
This month Rajnath Singh went further. He said he had asked the state government to move juveniles arrested for pelting stones from jail to remand homes and review their cases sympathetically. On November 22, the state government launched a scheme for amnesty to stone-pelters and withdrawal of cases against first- time offenders.
Of course, many of these are just statements but they are, nonetheless, significant and, taken together, suggest determination if not also sincerity.
However, the most striking promise is one thats got the least attention. When asked by this paper on November 17 if the Special Representative would speak to Hurriyat, BJP General Secretary Ram Madhav not only confirmed he would but pointedly added: The dialogue has to happen in a very open manner, without any precondition. In fact, this echoed what Madhav had told this paper in August last year. At that time he said the government was ready to engage all sections of the Valleys society and Kashmiris could ask for the moon within the Indian Constitution.
No one can dismiss all these comments as one-offs or made casually. Theyve been spoken by men of responsibility and repeated so often they clearly form a consistent chain. So the natural expectation is these comments must have led to major changes. But if they havent then, surely, the question I began with is valid?
And as for the claim there will be no preconditions and Kashmiris can ask for the moon the way the Prime Minister pounced on Chidambarams stand, that India should consider reforms that may restore the autonomy Kashmir had at accession, suggests many of these things were said more for effect than implementation.
Now lets look at whats happened. For a whole year Ram Madhavs promises of August 2016 were forgotten before the Prime Minister revived them but only verbally. A Special Representative of cabinet rank has, no doubt, been appointed but so far he hasnt made a credible effort to speak to Hurriyat. And as for the claim there will be no preconditions and Kashmiris can ask for the moon the way the Prime Minister pounced on Chidambarams stand, that India should consider reforms that may restore the autonomy Kashmir had at accession, suggests many of these things were said more for effect than implementation.
So do you get the feeling the BJP knows how to say the right things but doesnt act on them or is inexplicably slow to do so? And then, side by side, theres all this talk of scrapping Articles 35 (A) and 370 or building Sainik Colonies which, admittedly, may be intended to taunt but certainly dont reassure Kashmiris.
As I admitted, Im not sure theres a disconnect but it certainly seems like one. However, what Im more certain of is theres confusion in the BJPs and the governments thinking. They either dont realise what theyve said or dont want to act on their statements.
If this leads you to the conclusion they say one thing and do another I wouldnt necessarily disagree.
The Article First Appeared In The Hindustan Times
Be Part of Quality Journalism
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.