The Supreme Court on Monday rejected former National Advisory Council (NAC) member and social activist Harsh Manders petition challenging BJP president Amit Shahs discharge in the 2005 Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case, saying he has no locus standi in the matter.
A small-time gangster, Sheikh and his wife, Kauser Bi, were killed while travelling from Hyderabad to Sangli in Maharashtra near Gandhinagar in 2005.
Mander had sought the quashing of the December 30, 2014, order of a Mumbai sessions court discharging Shah in the murder case. He then approached the Bombay high court against the sessions court order but the HC in March this year refused to go into the merits of the discharge order on the ground that Mander was not an aggrieved party in the case.
The former bureaucrat petitioned the HC after Sohrabuddins brother withdrew his appeal against Shahs discharge, which was not even challenged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
Only a genuinely aggrieved person can challenge the discharge under the criminal jurisprudence. One must realise the impact of allowing such a petition, which is this person can be interminably prosecuted, a bench headed by justice SA Bobde told Manders counsel senior advocate Kapil Sibal.
With the SC order and none of the affected parties standing against the trial court verdict the relief given to Shah appears to be final.
When the person is genuinely aggrieved then the issue takes a different colour but when the person is not remotely connected and wants to revive the case then its a different matter, the bench noted after hearing Mander and Shahs advocates for over half an hour.
But Sibal underlined public faith to argue Manders case. He said: Public must get the feeling that nobody is above the law. To this, the court said it does not consider anyone above the law.
Sibal argued that the HC must decide Manders plea on merits without getting into technicalities such as the petitioners locus. Let the CBI find out why the CBI turned turtles. Even his (Sohrabuddin) brother who filed the case against Shah withdrew his case later, he said.
Sibal contended the CBI filed a charge sheet and named Shah as accused number 16. It is a case of murder, the senior counsel said.
Shahs counsel, senior advocate Harish Salve, questioned the locus of Mander in the case. This court has already held that if one is not connected with the case, he cannot interfere with anyones trial, Salve told the bench.
Opposing the prayer, Salve said, It cannot be a case that if State is not going to file an appeal, I will file the appeal.
Be Part of Quality Journalism
Quality journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce and despite all the hardships we still do it. Our reporters and editors are working overtime in Kashmir and beyond to cover what you care about, break big stories, and expose injustices that can change lives. Today more people are reading Kashmir Observer than ever, but only a handful are paying while advertising revenues are falling fast.